Productivity Commission says curfew creates more noise



[ad_1]

It is a fact known to Inner West residents in Sydney that if you need to wake up early, there is no point in setting an alarm – the powerful roar of the Emirates A380, which takes off from Sydney to Dubai at 6 am, is more than enough to do the job. .

But the thousands who live under the flight routes of Australia's busiest airport were at least reassured by a rigid curfew that prevented airplanes from landing or departing during bedtime between 11pm and 6am.

So many of these people are now calling a new report suggesting that the curfew and the movement caps of the aircraft have actually created more noise, not less.

In its preliminary report on the economic regulation of Australian airports, the Productivity Commission said the Sydney airport limit, which is limited to 80 hours per hour, and the curfew from 11am to 6am, are "unnecessarily restrictive."

The commission did not call for the current agreements to be canceled, but indicated that aircraft arriving ahead of schedule were forced to spend long periods flying over the airport, creating "unintentional noise" for residents living near the airport. extra emissions and unnecessary burning of fuel.

"Limit of movement and the curfew sometimes result in more noise and emissions, despite its goal of noise reduction," the report said.

"The goal of managing the effect of aircraft noise on local residents should be balanced with reforms that benefit the wider community, including through efficiency improvements at Sydney Airport."

He added the movement cap, which was measured every 15 minutes, and the curfew "exacerbated delays" in times of unexpected incidents such as bad weather.

"Delays that lead to congestion, particularly during peak periods, may force some aircraft to wait in the ground or air until the next 15-minute scroll time before they can take off or land to avoid breaking the limit of movement. , Said the report.

"Aircraft movements can be completely banned when delays extend into the collection period. "Delays interfere with passenger schedules, create costs for airlines and have a continuing effect on Australia's aviation network due to the large number of aircraft passing through Sydney airport."

The commission suggested that the aircraft's maximum movement limit could be measured over a longer period of the day, such as an average of 80 movements every four hours, to allow the airport to recover faster from delays and reduce aircraft noise . air.

He also said that aircraft movements could be limited according to the amount of noise made by each aircraft.

Many of those who live near or near the airport's flight routes said that dropping curfew would mean more noise while most tried to sleep.

"The great thing for me would be to find a way to minimize the noise, and the best way to do that is to use the bay (Botany Bay) for takeoffs and landings," Ray, who lives in Tempe, near the airport. , told news.com.au.

"As long as those planes land from the bay between 11:00 pm and 6:00 p.m., that would reduce the noise, and normally any aircraft in circulation is loud enough not to be heard. I can see them circling from my backyard.

In its submission to the Productivity Commission last year, the Australian Commission on Competition and Consumers said curfew and traffic limits were likely to contribute to the chaos of congestion at Sydney airport.

The ACCC said they should be reviewed regularly to ensure they were appropriate and reflected the technological advances that have reduced aircraft noise.

Airport lobby and transportation groups are calling for curfew at Sydney airport to be relaxed.

Elsewhere in the report, the Productivity Commission argued for the cost of parking at Australian airports, despite complaints from passengers that the cost of airport parking often exceeded that of airfare.

The commission is seeking feedback on the draft report and should make a recommendation in its final report, due to be submitted to the federal government in June.

[ad_2]

Source link