Tuesday , August 20 2019
Home / singapore / Documents reveal that children were filmed in the bathroom several times by voyeur in NUS

Documents reveal that children were filmed in the bathroom several times by voyeur in NUS



[ad_1]

SINGAPORE – A graduate student who has taken videos of children in a bathroom on several occasions at the National University of Singapore (NUS) has received a 24-month conditional warning instead of being sued by police, according to a document detailing offenses heard by the school. disciplinary council between 2015 and 2018 and its results.

The documents – which were obtained from the university's student portal and loaded over the weekend by a group of NUS students on Facebook – reveal that the NUS Disciplinary Board heard at least 26 cases of sexual misconduct during the three years academics.

Several of the cases involved students taking pictures and videos of male and female students in the shower and upskirt videos. In other incidents, the offenders touched the thighs or buttocks of the students.

The document, however, also revealed that the children were among the victims of the sexual voyeur in NUS.

READ: NUS students call school to be held accountable for sexual misconduct on campus

In the case contained in the document, a graduate student had "entered a restroom and filmed children in the adjacent cubicle on several occasions" between 2015 and 2016, according to the document.

The perpetrator was given a 24-month probation by the police. He was also temporarily suspended for two semesters, ordered to receive mandatory counseling and psychological assessment, fined $ 1,000.00 and issued an official reprimand.

The CNA sought more NUS information on the case.

READ: "We fall short": NUS president apologizes to former students for dealing with cases of sexual misconduct

NUS & # 39; dealing with cases of sexual misconduct has been under the spotlight, after graduation Monica Baey took to Instagram to ask for a tougher action against a student filming her taking a shower.

Education Minister Ong Ye Kung said on Monday that the penalties imposed on Baey's perpetrator – which included a one-semester suspension and a ban on campus facilities – were "manifestly inadequate."

Responding to the case involving children, lawyers with whom CNA spoke said that while universities have the right to decide how they wish to review incidents at their premises, offenses involving minors or minors are generally considered more serious.

READ: & # 39; Extremely Disappointed & # 39; with the city council about sexual misconduct: NUS Students & # 39; Union

Cheryl Ng of Intelleigen Legal said that in the case of the student filming children in the bathroom, while a conditional warning "seems a little surprising," there may be facts that are unknown.

"AGCs generally take a very firm stand when children are victims in such situations. It is also more aggravating that children are the main target. is not the strength of the evidence, "Ng said.

"If there is no evidence, it can be difficult to successfully prosecute the alleged defendant. As such, the AGC or the police will choose to issue a notice instead," Ng added.

Gloria-James Civetta, a lawyer at Gloria James-Civetta & Co, said the fact that the offense occurred on school grounds gives the university "the right to discipline or refer the case to the police."

Taking into account that the offender is a student and the video was apparently not disclosed, the decision taken by the Disciplinary Board "fits into the crime," said James-Civetta.

She added that the student may face charges under the Film Law or the Children and Young Persons Act.

READ: 19-year-old man investigated for spying incident Tom in male bathroom in NTU residential hall

Che Wei Chin of the Covenant Chambers said that in cases of vulnerable victims such as children, the AGC is more likely to issue accusations rather than merely a conditional warning.

"Some factors that the AGC will probably consider when deciding on the collection of fees are: the degree of culpability, the harm done to children (and) if there are considerations of public policy," said Che.

Still, he added, it is AGC's right to ask the police to issue a conditional notice if it judges that the person's actions are an isolated incident and their chances of recurrence are not high.

However, if the person filmed children multiple times in different periods of time, each occasion of filming may constitute a charge and the person may technically face multiple charges.

"In such cases, a conditional warning can be unjustifiably lenient," Che said.

IRB Lawyer Ashwin Ganapathy added that although a conditional warning does not represent a legally binding blame statement, it may nonetheless have a dissuasive effect on the student.

"In this case, the beneficiary received a 24-month conditional notice, which means that he is forced to stay on the right path of the law for the next 24 months," said Ganapathy.

"Twenty-four months is by no means a short period of time. If he does not nurture the opportunity offered to him and relapse, he is likely to be charged with the latest offenses and the offenses for which he received the conditional warning." Ganapathy added.

Anisha Joseph, head of AWARE's Sexual Assault Care Center, said that because children can not legally consent to a range of actions, the need to protect children's privacy is even stronger than that of adults.

"There may be a belief that filming a child in a bathroom because it is not physical violence, it is not abuse or it is a lesser form of abuse. However, without even getting into what the offender planned to do with filming, filming someone without Your knowledge or permission is a clear breach of privacy and respect, "said Joseph.

"It is the responsibility of institutions to adopt a zero-tolerance approach to sexual harassment in their settings through strong policies, procedures and training."

She added, "We expect institutions to keep their communities safe, more than we expect individuals to protect themselves or their children from harm."

Additional reporting by Jalelah Abu Baker.

[ad_2]
Source link