[ad_1]
Vladm Gaidys, head of Vilmorus, sociologist, said ratings are something that is falling faster than rising.
"If something happened or someone found something – a nonmarital child, then they can change very quickly to the negative side." And on the positive side, everything is deep.
Let's remember, Grybauskaitė's rank fell 10% a second after the tulip scandal. It has been growing for years and has not yet reached the previous level, "Gaidys said.
The sociologist agreed that Adamkus was still an authority in our society, though he said – not revolutionary.
"Both Čiurlionis and Smetona are authorities. There's really no point here, but it will not be worse with that, "Gaidys said.
According to the sociologist, V. Adamkus' support may have a greater influence on some groups in society – for example, the Santara – Luz community.
"They could have taken Šimonytė as their own. But for the Santara Light community, Adamkus' voice is quite significant. But for a large number in Lithuania, that voice is not very audible and will not have a decisive influence, "Gaidys said.
Ališauskienė: Adamkus appreciates in society
Rasa Ališauskienė, head of the Baltic Studies and sociologist, noted that V. Adamkus is appreciated in society.
"V. Adamkus, according to a closed question, is the most popular among public figures, and when people mention the most reliable public figures, it is the third to the fourth after D. Grybauskaitė and S. Skvernel G. Nausėda , Mr Adamkus and Mr Šimonytė also go there '- said Mr R. Ališauskienė.
According to the Baltic Studies, Adamkus does not like 12%, but likes 79%. researched. Among all the most trustworthy public figures in society, it has the least negative rankings. For example, Grybauskaitė receives 69 percent.
The sociologist could not say what percentage of Adamkus's support he would make, but noted that this was an important factor.
"It is important that Adamkus worked with G. Nausėda. He worked at his headquarters. This means that the support is based on the candidate's experience and personal knowledge. It is only more important if G. Nausėda is able to use it, "said R. Ališauskienė.
The trio of leaders did not change
Spinter Research's latest survey showed that Gitan Nausada, whose March ranking was 27.9%, and 28.2% in February, remained in first place. February – 22.1 percent And third – Saulius Skvernelis, whose support in March was 14.5 percent, and in February – 15.3 percent.
Arvydas Juozaitis ranked fourth in this survey. Its ranking was 5% in March and 4.8% in February. Vytenis Povilas Andriukaitis had 4.2 percent in March and 3 percent in February. Support. Nagli Puteiki's rating in March was 2.3%, and in February 1.9%, Valdemar Tomaševski – 1.9% and 1.7%, respectively, Mindaugas Puidokas – 0.7%. and 0.4%, Valentino Mazuronis – 0.6%, respectively. and 1 percent For Petras Gražulis, 0.2% would have voted in March, 1.3% in February and 0.1% for Petras Auštrevičius. and 2 percent respondents.
0.2 percent the struggle of respondents and 1.1 percent. "You would have voted for another candidate in February. 9.2 percent survey in March and 7.4 percent. – Do not vote in February. And 8.4%. the respondents' struggle and 9.8%. in February did not know what to vote for.
On March 18 – April 10, Spinter Research conducted another study, interviewing people only directly, the so-called face-to-face method.
In that case, G.Nausėda 's classification was 26,5%, I.Simonytė – 21,8%, S.Svernelis – 16,8%. The room was V. Andriukaitis with 6.2 percent. It was left behind by A. Juozaitis, whose classification was 5%, N. Puteikis – 2.6%, V. Tomaševskis – 1.8%, M. Puidoko – 0.6%, V. Mazuronys – 0, 3 percent, P. Austrevičius and P. Gražulis – 0.1 percent. Another 0.1% interviewees would choose another candidate, 10.2% would not vote, and 7.9% did not vote. did not know what to vote for.
[ad_2]
Source link