According to DELFI, Zagreck was repeatedly questioned not only by the Special Investigation Service (STT) but also by a pre-trial judge in the Vilnius City District Court. Recent research is designed to ensure the credibility of future statements if the suspect changes his mind and decides to change his position.
Lawyer research has brought confusion to the legal community – lawyers who are usually prosecuted are reluctant to respond to law enforcement authorities and try to avoid any negative consequences in any way and expect the court to be acquitted of the charges.
According to sources, collaborating with police officers, Zagreck decided to have access to some of the pre-trial investigation data and after interviews with the investigators – he realized that they had a lot of secret information they could never deny. These are not just phone records or conversations at the judges' offices and at the law firm.
It is possible that D. Zagreck, who received most of the suspected corruption in the case, hopes to mitigate his responsibility. It is true that the Penal Code provides for the possibility of dismissal of a suspect if he cooperates with law enforcement and agrees to assist in the detection of criminal offenses committed by himself and others. This provision could apply to a lawyer suspected of bribery of judges only upon completion of a large pre-trial investigation.
At that time, authorities investigating potential corruption in the judicial system did not comment on the investigation, but so far they have been the subject of intense prosecution – STT spokeswoman Renata Endružytė said 49 people were being prosecuted, 8 of which are judges and 6 lawyers. According to her, the authorities are currently investigating about 100 criminal offenses.
The list of suspects includes lawyers and judges. Many of them also agreed to cooperate with the authorities – their detailed interviews were also conducted with pre-trial judges.
At that time, some suspects, including judges, are still reluctant to answer questions. Or – categorically deny the accusations made against them, some say that by talking about the outcome of the cases in question, they were just laughing.
Authorities have promised that criminal proceedings should be brought to court not before the end of the year, but the deadline may be extended when the investigation is extended. In addition, several procedural steps have been taken so far – it does not exclude that the circle of suspects also expands.
Lawyer D. Zagreckas is not practicing lawyers while his pretrial judge's order has been arrested, his representative to the Lithuanian Bar Association has requested a temporary but indefinite suspension of his lawyer's activities. Lawyers for other suspects are not removed from office because they have not received a valid conviction.
Zagreck has been a criminal in several cases since 1998. He is suspected of having at least 12 felony counts, the most difficult being related to possible bribery of judges and the impact of trade. It is suspected that a lawyer with many years of experience had friendly relations with the judges of the highest courts and could even have been the one who agreed with them to make useful decisions for the people accused of the crime. In addition, it is even suggested that the lawyer could have open doors for most of the judges' offices.
Prior to his arrest, the lawyer publicly said that when he went to see Lukiškės Prison with one of his clients, he learned that his suitcase secretly had screening and listening equipment – a bug with a SIM card and other technical accessories. He was captured by prison guards after checking the suitcase of the lawyer with an X-ray machine. About this Zagreck informed the leadership of the Lithuanian Bar Association, and a few days later other people were arrested with suspected corruption.
Zagreck was the oldest lawyer, but was released before the end of his arrest. Giedrė Cimbolienė, a lawyer previously in charge, was charged with the defense of Marija Taraškevičius, who was arrested by a large number of smugglers in court proceedings. Previously, in the house of M. Taraškevičius, the authorities registered prohibited agreements on how to bribe the now convicted judge of the Vilnius Regional Court Ryšardas Skirtunas. The conversations recorded at the house of M. Tashkevich also swept the lawyer Sigitas Juodelis. Advocate G. Cimboliene is a former assistant judge at the Vilnius City District Court, and was often seen by the judges in the judges' offices when she was a lawyer. Sources point out that Cimboliene could agree to cooperate with law enforcement.
Although the law has not yet revealed which judges were found in 200,000. and that money could have been received as possible bribes, sources say the largest sums of money were found by civil judges. In addition, no information is published on cases that have led to criminal prosecution but only on the history of Klaipėda when one person accused another and agreed to be convicted of illegally disposing of a large amount of cocaine.
The study also mentions the famous story of Druskininkai Vijūnėlė Manor, by which he agreed to pay 50 thousand. bribery of the euro. This building was ordered by the courts of all instances to demolish, but the judicial decision was not enforced, and a new case was submitted to the court, requesting the suspension of the order of execution of the judicial decision and allowing the reconstruction of the existing structure according to the purpose of the buildings allowed in the recreation area, reconciling reconstruction proposals according to the procedure prescribed by legal acts, optimally suited to the recreational infrastructure development needs of the city of Druskininkai. This case had to be handled by the Vilnius Regional Court judge, Henrich Jaglinski, but he resigned immediately before the hearing. The case was then referred to another court for resumption of proceedings, but he did not respond to the request.
This case is being referred to the Supreme Court of Lithuania. According to sources, officials suspect that it was precisely because of the so-called Vijūnėlė solar case that the judge of the Vilnius Regional Court, Mr Jaglinski, could have received 40,000. Eur, but later that money ended up being paid. And later the case of Vijūnėlė Manor was found in the LAT – a panel of three judges adopted a cassation appeal in November.
Authorities suspect that the long-standing judge of this court, Egidijus Laužikas, may have been caught in the fingers of this case, although he is not mentioned on any official page of this story. The former chair of the Judicial Council, which is responsible for all Lithuanian judges, has been charged with bribery and the impact of trade – a judge is also suspected of having promised one of his acquaintances during a conversation to investigate a criminal case.
The conversation between the judge and his friend was recorded by STT agents and secretly recorded at one of the capital's cafes. It is probably in this case that the STT has already questioned two judges of the LAT Criminal Division. Also in the case of corruption, Aring Kartan, an assistant court in the Criminal Division of this court, was arrested and prosecuted, whose mother also works on final and uncontested judgments in the trial court. She resigned as president of the Court of Honor.
It turns out that the judges and lawyers have a very open mind, but also some very ambiguous conversations. They were searched by corruption investigators not only in the judges' workplaces but also in several cafes as well as in the conversations of lawyers in their offices and telephones.
According to unconfirmed data, officials suspected of potential corruption even decided to register their interviews with clients – not just in law firms, but even in Remand de Lukiškės prison. Prosecutor Zagreck was the "most attentive" in the secret investigation – an experienced lawyer could be considered the "gray cardinal" who dealt with the judges.
Attorney General Evaldas Pašilis, after detaining suspected corruption, did not even spell words in the wool: "The law firm has negotiated justice."
Law enforcement has captured many of Zagrecko's meetings with judges, both with Viktor Kaži and Valdimaru Bavėyanas, who are prosecuted in the Criminal Division of the Lithuanian Court of Appeal and the judges of the Vilnius Regional Court in the same building, which are not processed. During an interview, a lawyer even told one of the court suspects where the lower court judge had to talk about the case.
"Then sitting at the back of the cafe," the court's lawyer, "Thames," was the judge.
In addition, the lawyer had friendly relations with Klaipeda's lawyer, Aivars Surbli – the lawyer's name was mentioned in a criminal case investigated in Klaipėda when it was planned to disrupt the health of two police officers. This investigation was halted, but after the corruption scandal it was decided to retake the case – prosecutors alleged that significant information was obtained on alleged criminal acts that were not even known before.
In the present case, Vilius Karalius, who is currently being sentenced by the daughter of Lazdijai Court President, is also appointed as the King of Smuggling and is currently being convicted of illegal transportation of consumer products. V. King was also viscous by open conversations – he was interested in attending a meeting to see if it would be possible to help his currently condemned friend.
While not wishing to undermine the current intensive pretrial investigation, authorities are still unwilling to share the information they have captured, but it has not been officially suggested that the arrests of suspects in the so-called Judicial Corruption Case are not yet over – handcuffs can be not only for lawyers, but also for judges. And if this does not happen, information about inappropriate relationships should be passed on to the municipal court.
For now, it is not known how long the investigation of the authorities lasted, but DELFI sources point out that authorities have investigated crimes committed in recent years – and especially in the last six months. Some of them were completed shortly before the detention operation.
The Office of the Prosecutor General and STT arrested 49 people for investigating potential corruption – a large-scale investigation of bribery, commercial effects, bribery and abuse of justice.
The presidential decrees suspended the powers and allowed 8 judges to be tried: E. Laužikas, Judge of the Division of Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of Lithuania, V. Kazis and V. Bavėjanas, Judges of the Criminal Cases Division of the Lithuanian Court of Appeal, Konstantin Gurin, Judge of the Civil Court Division of the Lithuanian Court of Appeal, Vilnius Judge H. Jaglinsky, Judge of the District Court of the City of Vilnius, Robert Rainis, Judge of the Regional Administrative Court of Vilnius, Arūnas Kaminskas, Judge of Kaunas, Chamber of the Gintaras Čekanauskas Regional Administrative Court.
Judges have extensive work experience of 24-37 years, they have not pursued a career for many years, so special service officers have no reason to check their relationship with the criminal world.
Six solicitors suspected of bribery, mediation and other criminal offenses were arrested in the case of corruption – D. Zagreck, R. Miklius, G. Cimboliene, A. Surblys, Marius Navickas (practitioner in Klaipėda), Gintaras Ruseckas, Assistant Judge of the Supreme Court of Lithuania A. Kartanas, other lawyers and individuals.
Suspects are also taken to the mayor of Druskininkai Ričardas Malinauskas, his adviser Aivar Kadziauskas, as well as the owner of Vijūnėlė manor Žilvinas Povilonis.
STTs and prosecutors have already reported that detainees are suspected of committing serious and serious crimes by sharing and acting in organized groups: bribes between 1 and 100,000 were allegedly promised and paid for by various court decisions. Eur. The amount of bribes agreed in the pre-trial investigation can reach $ 400,000. Eur.
Authorities do not disclose bribes.
Attorney General E. Pasil said this case is exceptional not only because of the scale of corruption or the size of bribes, but because of the consequences for society as a whole.
"Corruption, bribery, exposure to influence to make some sort of illegal decision means not only the damage that can be determined by calculating the amount of bribery received," Pasil said. – It is "in the name of the court" to "push" one's selfish and illegal decisions, the fate of victims and unfulfilled justice. This is the loss of people's trust in justice. So only one decision was made to get a pre-trial investigation and answer all questions about possible crimes.
"This pre-trial investigation is a signal to the entire judiciary that decisions and changes must be made to prevent possible manifestations of corruption," said Žydrūnas Bartkus, director of STT. – In Lithuania, the transparent administration of justice must be ensured – first and foremost, our civic duty, the foundation of the rule of law. "
A group of five prosecutors are investigating a possible criminal offense, with three being granted the status of a special prosecutor. Note that until the guilt of the suspects has been proven by the court, they are considered innocent.
It is strictly forbidden to use information published by DELFI on other sites, in the media or elsewhere, or distribute our material in any form without consent, and if consent is received, it is necessary to specify DELFI as a source.