In the competition for the LTV board, NEPLP did not follow the relevant norms of the law / Article / LSM.LV



[ad_1]

The National Electronic Media Council (NEPLP), in organizing a competition for the Latvian Television Directorate (LTV), was not guided by the relevant rules of the law. It was concluded by the Legal Office of Saeima, stressing the need for very serious and legally justified reasons to suspend the members of the Council. An additional assessment of the Council's responsibility in the Saeima Media Commission is likely to be undertaken.

Since the announcement of the competition for the LTV Board, he has been criticized by the media and good management experts, as well as by lawyers from Saeima and the Ministry of Justice, noting that NEPLP did not take into account the rules of the Companies Act, for example the composition of the Appointments Committee. Meanwhile, the council emphasized that they were subject to a very different law – the Electronic Media Act – and acted on their own.

If it was allowed to do so by the board, one of the questions that the parties of the coalition asked the Bureau of the Saeima about the results of the council of competition and the dismissal of both winners. On Tuesday afternoon, he concluded that "the Legal Secretary of Saeima had already indicated at the relevant meetings of the committee that he did not agree with such an interpretation of the legal norms of the Council.The Legal Department considered that the Board should have applied not only to the Media Electronics when organizing a competition for Latvia. " law, but also the provisions of the Law on the Management of Capital Companies ".

In its response to the second coalition issue – in which cases the Saeima can decide on the resignation of the council or some of its members, the Office of Advocacy emphasizes the independence of the media regulator, which has recently been strengthened in one of the Union's directives European. However, the Legal Office draws attention to the fact that Article 56 (3) of the Electronic Media Act gives good standing to Board members. This requirement was previously used to dismiss a board member. However, Saeima's lawyers emphasize that reputation loss is a very broad concept to be interpreted and should be used with great care as the basis for dismissal.

In cases where there may be a suspicion of a breach of the law by the council or individual members, such assessment must first be conducted by competent independent bodies. "Attīstība / Par!", Which inspired the evaluation of Council action, emphasizes that the opinion of the Saeima Legal Office proves that the competition for the LTV Council should be treated differently and that the work would be the media committee responsible for media.

"Development / To!" Leader Daniel Pavlut said: "This committee has every opportunity to invite NEPLP members to question, seek the views of independent competent authorities and get opinions on whether or not certain laws have been violated and then judge whether this would require some concrete action by the Saeima.

Pavluts also emphasized that the results of the prosecution's investigation would be crucial. It is proposed that the Association of Journalists of Latvia be submitted, which indicates the possible noncompliance with the results of the LTV Council competition with the Electronic Media Law invoked by the Council itself.

Meanwhile, the chairman is ready to explain his actions. "We do not believe that neither I nor my colleagues, currently four, have violated the law, so, of course, we will try to prove our truth to the end," said NEPLP President Dace Kezbere. Although the council has repeatedly pointed out that the competition has finished with the best possible result, Kezbere admits – after all he has spoken in the public space of the council chairman elected by the council – to think about voting again in the Einars Giel.

To hold a new contest, the council will decide at the end of next week.

[ad_2]

Source link