Friday , October 22 2021

YouTube CEO apologizes for damaging content that does not violate GIGAZINE's policy



[ad_1]



Although the journalist was attacked by a YouTube movie of right-wing commentators about "being gay" and "being Latin American," YouTube said that "Content is a policy." YouTube's decision not to violateSusan WashickeyThe CEO apologized. On the other hand, the decision "is not a policy violation" has not changed, and YouTube's decision is still receiving major criticism.

YouTube CEO apologizes to LGBTQ community after protests – The Verge
https://www.theverge.com/2019/6/10/8660473/youtube-lgbtq-susan-wojcicki-carlos-maza-steven-crowder


YouTube can allow hate speech if that is part of a bigger argument – the Vox
https://www.vox.com/identities/20019/6/518653900/youtube-lgbtq-hate-speech-policy-carlos-maza-steven-crowder

The news media was the beginning of things.VoxI'm a journalistCarlos MazaRight-wing commentator / comedian Steven Crowder, who is active on YouTube, has revealed he is being "attacked." Maza is a person with a homosexual and Latin American past, but Crowder seems to have continued to make it a source of laughter in the movie that Maza posted on his YouTube channel on those points.

In the next post, Maza revealed how Crowder was attacking with Maza as a source. As Crowder turned Maza into the show, it seems Crowder's followers harassed Maza on Twitter and leaked personal information such as phone numbers.


In contrast, YouTube's official account responds directly to Maza on Twitter. In that sense, YouTube expressed the view that Crowder's remark "hurts people, but it's not a violation of politics." From Crowder's point of view about "the host of the program," this is a view expressed in a broader political debate, and it was determined that it was not harassment, Vox said.Shows.


On Youtube "Harassment and Internet Bullying Policy"Although Mr Crowder is clearly harassed on the basis of sexual orientation and cultural background, there is a possibility that such actions will be allowed if they are part of the" larger debate. "YouTube viewing has caused a stir. Maza is retuited in tens of thousands,Every NewsCame to get it.

And this time youtubeRevised community guidelines. While the new guidelines mention efforts to fight white and extremist hate speeches, "content containing malicious expressions is primarily intended for education, documentary, science, and art. May be allowed on YouTube. "While YouTube has not worried about revised and Maza's guidelines, many people, including Google employees, have protested against YouTube's behavior as if hate speech were acceptable.


And on June 10, 2019, local time, YouTube CEO Susan Washiky apologized for the situation at the developer conference in Arizona, USA. "I understand that the decisions we made were detrimental to the LGBT Q community, and that was not what we intended," Wassicky said.


"YouTube is home to many LGBT Q creators, and that's why it's an emotional issue. It's harder than making a decision, it's our mouth." And even if we decide, there will be a lot of people in the community LGBTQ on YouTube. We want to openly help this community and the company. "I hope to continue to support them in the future," he continued, explaining the importance of "maintaining consistency from a political standpoint." In other words, if you delete content, you'll need to exclude many other content.

The company said that when acting on a channel depends on the context. Nightly shows and rap movies may contain words and content that may be considered harmful, but from the context of "nightly programs" and "twists", these contents are targeted for exclusion. It can not be considered.


On the other hand, YouTube decided that Crowder's content "is not suitable for monetization" and stopped announcing. In response to this, Crowder is conducting the "# Vox Adpocalypse" campaign, which states "Vox is trying to shut down individual creators."

Maza believes that turning off advertising on YouTube will not solve the problem. "The abusers will use this as evidence of discrimination against them, based on that they will sell and sell their products, broadcast live shows and seek financial support from their followers. Maza.Posted in Twitter.

While watching a large number of films to understand the context of the content, Woessicky discovered that Crowder's film was not a violation of politics, but at the same time identified an area that could be improved.

Also, on this subject Google that owns YouTubeThunder PichaiThe CEO also has an idea.

How do you eliminate harmful, but "gray" YouTube content? Google CEO replies on GIGAZINE


Copy the title and URL of this article

[ad_2]
Source link