There is a whole story, different from what is known, behind Maurizio Costanzo and Maria De Filippi's photo portraits like two married married. Giovanni Ciacci revealed that the photo in question would be a photomontage desired by a famous editor of a newspaper of the time, which he did not want to cite. We collect information and purchase the original copy of this Month People 1992 where the director in question, the late Sandro Mayer, would strongly desire the most commented couple in Italian journalism to a photo shoot, in wedding clothes.
The reason, however, was not the occasion of their true marriage, which took place on August 28, 1995, three years later, but a special "Super Married" scheduled for the March issue. In addition, Mayer asked Constantius to sign a follow-up editorial entitled Wedding praisein which the journalist could have explained, in the light of his three failed marriages, why he still believed in the sacred union between two individuals and, above all, how much he desired him with his companion at the time, beside her for two years, Maria Of Filippi.
The alleged photomontage was presented as a real photo
The photo in question, that of Costanzo, a daring bridegroom with a white flower on his eyeliner with varnished and catatonic De Filippi, accompanied the editorial with a caption probably written by the same Mayer. In this paragraph, entitled separately "A little fun, a little test?"Explained why the newspaper wanted a marriage treaty signed by the well-known multi-divorced journalist and why he asked the couple to pose in those wedding dresses without making any reference to the fact that it was one falsification:
Maurizio Costanzo firmly believes in marriage and wrote the beautiful article of "praise" We publish in these pages: The popular journalist has married three times and it is possible that one day he may still make the big step with Maria De Filippi, who is the good companion of his life. And knowing how full of humor and intelligence, Maurizio and Maria, we had the idea of asking them to present this issue of "super married" on the cover. As you have seen, they gracefully consented wearing the wedding dress and the groom's suit, creating a real compliment to the wedding with this fun image. For our part, we do with Costanzo, who, as we said, firmly believes in the institution and Mary's desire to wear these clothes for a new cover very soon.
The false story and wrong beliefs
In March 1992, these words marked what would become the "case" of a still unthinkable 3.0 era filled with a number of errors and inaccuracies. In short, what Ciacci declared photomontage was not presented as such on the front page of Gente Mese; the conviction that it was a service publicized at the same time as the marriage is completely unfounded, since it was at least three years earlier; and finally, the will of Maurizio Costanzo and Maria De Filippi to show themselves how on the day of the supposed marriage that has already taken place is invented from scratch, since everything was born from the beginning as a piece of furniture or a photographic service of imposition. from Sandro Mayer for a especially at weddings to be included in Rusconi's popular monthly magazine.
Costanzo's editorial was a declaration of love
And the final words of Maurizio Costanzo's editorial had no other purpose than to lay a solid, public foundation for what his story was like with & # 39; legal & # 39; Maria De Filippi for two years (the two met in 1990), explaining the desire to realize with her a life project that, in fact, a few years later, would take them to Campidoglio in the presence of her exceptional officer, the then Mayor of Rome Francesco Rutelli. So the journalist closed the wedding compliment, presented on the front page with his motto "getting married is beautiful& # 39 ;:
Going back to the staff, I will say that despite three unsuccessful marriages, I do not cultivate grudges against the lives of two or two, but I have become a paladin, believing that only one cannot be. In fact, I remember my single periods as seasons of frenzy and melancholy: the former is unjustified, the latter justified. I will always bet on the day after day of my present story, the day to day of my present story, in the well-founded hope that I have finally taken the right path.