The Segmentation and Neglect of David Webb Mystery Network
It is said that the HKMA and the Securities and Futures Commission issued a joint circular, which indicated that Chinese financial institutions were hiding the financing of margin loans as investment projects through complicated trade agreements. David Webb pointed out that the transactions mentioned in the circular may involve "Minsheng Bank" (1988), "Bin Yin Capital" (1141) and "Greenland Hong Kong" (337).
David Webb speculates that the joint circular of the regulator refers to the People's Bank of China. (data frame)
Checking out Webb's "Mystery Net 26," published last year, used the chart to draw the intricate relationship between "Hua Rong" and "Minsheng", be it Webb's article, or Webb, follow the Securities and Futures Commission. And the joint circular? I believe it is both.
SFC Webb has always had a close relationship, echoed each other and even exchanged information. This is also an open secret, from "Mystery Net 50" to "Mystery Net 26" and the recent "Ding Yi Feng" suspension event (612 ). It can be seen that only official institutions that follow the results of private research do things, and are always inconsistent with the system, so they are not convinced.
A number of stocks of Webb and China Securities Regulatory Commission have hurt many people, and the penny-trading market has been greatly affected. But in the long run, no one will benefit because the number of investors in penny stocks has declined, but stock providers may have reduced more, and fewer incense burners are fewer ghosts. Perhaps when the bull market returns, the rest It is also very possible that the stock is "survived by the survivors."
One of the side effects of the "Minsheng" system was that the "Ministry of Commerce and Industry" (1632) that I bought fell on the chalkboard. As the trend was very ugly, only the target remained. I only used the AQ style to comfort myself: I also bought "Australian Construction" (1183) on the same day, which was much higher than the "Ministry of Commerce". In short, everything was credited.
I once wrote that the "network" written by Webb is not completely objective. For example, he wrote "Central South Network" many times, involving 32 actions, that is, intentionally neglecting the "Evergreen China Group" (3333) " Powerful stocks like PCCW (008), Taihe Holdings (718), "Grand Hotel" (045), "Fengdeli" (571), "Esprit" (330), etc. Writing penny stocks.
However, even if it is only for penny stocks, there are still mistakes in the right man, such as "Jinglian Group" (1751) in "Mystery Network 50", and shortly after the article was published, the board was quickly updated.
The author is a novelist, newspaper writer, stock investor and food and beverage expert.
Published on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays
Https://www.am730.com.hk/column/ 财经 / network david-webb Luozhi enigma target and ignored-170757