Friday , July 30 2021

Audio Collection Association: KTV invested by Jay Chou can’t play Jay Chou’s songs is a misrepresentation – Media Player / Video site

Recently, “Jay Chou invested in KTV defendants infringing more than 300 songs” attracted attention. Some public opinions don’t understand “Why doesn’t Jay Chou’s KTV play Jay Chou’s music?” On the evening of October 31, the China Audiovisual Copyright Collective Management Association released an explanation of the matter. He claimed that the infringing works included three MVs entitled “Rainbow”, but these three “Rainbow” were not the work of Jay Chou.


2020 Tmall Double 11 Coupon Entry Global merchandise pre-order will begin on October 21

JD Double Eleven Incoming Coupon: 40 less for every 300 in the top three home games

“KTV invested by Jay Chou cannot play Jay Chou’s songs” is misinformation like Zhang Guan and Li Dai. The explanation also stated that Jay Chou is not the legal representative and actual controller of the operating company “True Love Fantasy” KTV, and he should not be held responsible for copyright infringement by the company.

The full text of the description:

An explanation of the Internet broadcast of “Jay Chou invested in KTV defendant violation of 300 songs”

Recently, the incident of “Jay Chou’s investment in the breach of 300 songs by the defendant KTV” caused heated discussions on the Internet. Many Internet users expressed support for the Association’s rights protection activities. There are also many public opinions that fail to understand “Why didn’t Jay Chou invest KTV to play Jay Chou songs?”

It is now explained that the KTV “True Love Fantasy” sued by I will use more than 200 works of music and television (MV) owned by Rolling Stone International Music Co., Ltd. (Rolling Stone Music) without the permission of the rights owner copyright. The violated works include 3 video clips entitled “Rainbow”. But these three “Rainbow” are not Jay Chou’s works. They are songs with the same name composed by Axin and Liang Bojun by Liang Jingru, and songs with the same name composed by Yuquan and Du Dewei respectively sung by Yuquan and Du Dewei. Therefore, “KTV invested by Jay Chou cannot play Jay Chou’s songs” is misinformation like Zhang Guan and Li Dai.

In this case, the operating company of “True Love Fantasy” KTV was Xi’an Fantasy Catering and Entertainment Co., Ltd., and Mr. Zhou Jay Lun was not the legal representative and actual controller of the company, and he was not responsible for copyright infringement of the company. We contacted Mr. Jay Chou’s “Jiver Music” company to see if Mr. Chou has already given up his shares in Xi’an Fantasy Catering & Entertainment Co., Ltd. and has no business relationship with the company. “Jevier Music” also said: respect the judgment of this case and support all rights protection work that will protect the legal rights of authorized rights holders according to the law.

The China Audiovisual Copyright Collective Management Association is the only collective copyright management organization that issues copyright licenses in the karaoke field in China. You are authorized by the copyright owner of audiovisual works to exercise copyright or copyright-related rights on your behalf. Any karaoke location must legally obtain the copyright for the musical works. Work can only be used after permission. The safeguarding of the legal rights of copyrights in audiovisual works authorized by members is a statutory obligation that we always firmly comply with. All indemnities for the protection of rights will be paid to the holders of the rights of members after payment of notarization, lawyers and other expenses. protection of rights. In 2012, “Rolling Stone Music” authorized me to exercise collective management of copyright for their musical and television works. “Jewell Music” is also a member of our club and has maintained a good cooperative relationship with our club for many years.

Related articles:

Jay Chou’s KTV was reported by the Sound Collection Association for playing songs like “Rainbow”

Jay Chou issued a statement about the infringement incident and wanted to withdraw from the investment without consent

Source link