The Minister of Foreign Affairs, Teodoro Ribera, manifest your posture regarding it contention of powers that he faced before the Supreme Court (CS) and the Constitutional Court (TC) and what your judgment "Generates a new situation of great legal uncertainty".
"I believe that the decision of the Supreme Court generates a new situation of great legal uncertainty, and generally a modification of the system that is not foreseen in the constitutional text", says the canciller, lawyer and former TC member (2006-2009) in an interview with the channel CNN Chile.
Ribera explained that "this is the criticism of the Constitutional Court with some of its fall, but also to the Supreme Court. The political system does not work so that each body tries to maximize its potential, unless there is a claim to deferral"
The head of Chilean diplomacy, former Minister of Justice of the First Government of Sebastián Piñera (2011-2012), acknowledged that the cause concern that "by a protection feature can be reviewed the fall of the TC, because en definitive the TC is not the supreme guardian of the Constitution, as it is constitutionally ".
The so-called "clash of sleighs" between the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court originated behind it. argues that I did the last body of its autonomy and the office of its facilities, I believe that there Tercera Room of the maximum court determined that it could review data originating in the TC via protection features.
Ayer Miercoles, the Minister of Justice, Hernán Larraín, I recognized that the situation is of concern in La Moneda, and I called on the Judiciary and the TC to reach a consensus.
So, the president of the CS, Haroldo Brito, disregarding a dispute with the Constitutional Court, debasing the power struggle between both bodies, despite the harsh statement made by the President of the TC, Maria Luis Brahm, which I call "unfounded" the warning from the Supreme.