Bad signal: Government withdraws from Senate debate for equal marriage


Justice Minister Hernán Larraín was present only at the beginning of the session, and the head of Segpres, Gonzalo Blumel, chose not to attend. This was the session in which, after more than a year, the Constitution Committee resumed the same marriage project. For Francisco Huenchumilla (DC), the attitude of the government is a "political error", while from the Movil whipped Blumel. "He belongs to Evópoli, a party that claims to support egalitarian marriage but whose representatives in the government have only tried to block the law," said spokesman Rolando Jiménez.

One day that should be emblematic was this Wednesday in the Senate, with the resumption of the review of the same marriage project. More than a year ago, on November 27, 2017, it was the first and only time that the initiative was discussed in the Constitution Committee. However, today's session was controversial, given the attitude of the government.

What happened was that the Minister of Justice, Hernán Larraín, was present only at the beginning of the session; later, he chose to leave the room before the discussion took place. Meanwhile, the head of Segpres, Gonzalo Blumel, chose not to attend.

The government's attitude has been plagued by sexual minority organizations. Movil's leader, Rolando Jiménez, argued that "Blumel's absence explains the Executive's deep disdain for equal marriage and his lack of stature. The most paradoxical thing is that Blumel, along with Undersecretary of Human Rights, Lorena Recabarren, is of Evópoli, a party that claims to support an egalitarian marriage but whose representatives in the government have only tried to block the law. "

Meanwhile, Equal emphasized that "unfortunately, the minister @ gblumel did not attend the Senate Constitution Committee. The executive is subtracted from the discussion of the timing of fairness, despite the invitation from the commission.

It should be noted that the Government does not have the bill in the file and, in fact, before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, maintained that the State did not commit to approve an equal marriage law.

"Political error"

The attitude of the government was cataloged as a "political mistake" by DC Francisco Huenchumilla, chairman of the Constitution, Legislation and Justice Commission.

"I believe that the government makes a mistake by not discussing a project that interests a sector of citizenship. Regardless of the government's position, the government governs all Chileans, whatever their thinking, their point of view, and if there is a project that interests an industry, regardless of whether it is in the government program or not, it is important to know the position of the Executive. So let's present this to the government and we hope that in the next session he will come and tell us what you think. " the senator.

In the case, Senators PS Alfonso de Urresti and PPD Felipe Harboe were in favor of the project while, together with Chile Vamos, RN Andrés Allamand and UDI Victor Perez were present. The latter asserted that "I am opposed to this project, but we will not object to it being discussed."

What comes

The commission agreed to hold a session to hear civil law scholars before voting on the idea of ​​legislating.

"We agreed to invite teachers of Civil Law to illustrate this issue, because in the background we are modifying an institution that comes from a code that was approved in the nineteenth century, then according to the modern trends that are with other laws of the world, it is good to have an exposition of teachers so that we can make a good decision and a good law to leave and for that the academic point of view is fundamental, "said the senator.

As for deadlines, Huenchumilla said that the commission has other projects underway and that the issue will be for March. "We will end the legislative year with a lot of urgent matters that we have and therefore, this will not be seen in January, we will probably resolve it in March," he said.


Source link