The government's decision not to sign the UN Migration Agreement has caused a new conflict in La Moneda. The Executive's failure to explain his position made the ministers and President Piñera himself explain one after another. But the worst part was taken by the Foreign Affairs chief, because with the obvious discrepancies he had with Palacio, the clash of positions with the Interior Ministry and its zero political weight to impose its criteria remained publicly in evidence, the foreign policy authority simply has no interference in the decision-making of matters within its competence.
It was a difficult week for Foreign Minister Roberto Ampuero. The news, in the mouth of Interior Undersecretary Rodrigo Ubilla, that Chile would not sign the UN Migration Agreement, once again highlighted "the lack of weight of the minister," as they recognized these days in the Ministry. of Foreign Affairs. The mistakes and disagreements within the Pinerista administration are already a well-known story, and for this reason they have been trying for three days to explain why they have broken decades of foreign policy based on multilateralism, for example. to concentrate international policy resolutions on short-term criteria focused exclusively on national policy.
Ampuero arrived in Valparaiso on Tuesday to inform the Commission after a hectic Monday of remarks and remarks by La Moneda, on behalf of the chancellor and President Sebastián Piñera himself, on the government's conception of migrants' rights. Foreign Affairs, where something nervous tried to answer questions from opposition MPs. From the very Chancellery themselves they lamented the panorama in that appointment, because they assured that the chancellor had to carry with a resolution that happened exclusively by presidency and that was "maneuvered from the Ministry of the Interior".
"One is the right that someone has to leave their country, but not to enter any country," the minister emphasized repeatedly, until the commission's president, Pablo Vidal (RD), said directly: "Chancellor, the question is if you believe that migration is a human right. " A little discouraged and almost reluctant, Ampuero replied: "I think it is a human right to migrate," a phrase that went almost unnoticed on Tuesday, since in parallel the interpellation was developed for Interior Minister Andrés Chadwick, by death. Mapuche Camilo Catrillanca, but for those who did, he made it clear that the decision to leave the pact was not shared unanimously in the current government.
With these words, the chancellor had publicly contradicted the official position of La Moneda, who in the mouth of the undersecretary Ubilla assured The mercury on Sunday – to discuss the decision to leave the pact – that "migration is not a human right". The corridor talks yesterday with the press did not yield the expected results to try to lower the profile to the obvious clutter that once again had been installed in the Palace with this theme.
Neither the new round of statements from the authorities contributed. After finishing an activity around APEC, which will organize our country and concentrate all efforts of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Piñera left yesterday unexpectedly, again, to explain the position of his government on migration, but above all to insist that there was not a clash of visions within his administration at this point. Immediately, Ampuero confronted the press, tried to answer most of the questions, but avoided clarifying if there was a conflict with Deputy Secretary Ubilla. Shortly after, the spokeswoman Cecilia Pérez returned to touch the matter and emphasized that there is no political contradiction between the Interior and the Chancellery.
A lot of statement and explanation are supported, in addition to the clash of views, that in La Moneda were not satisfied with the unfolding of the chancellor on Monday morning, who gave a press point to explain precisely the withdrawal of Chile from the migratory pact . That should close the point or at least channel the debate, but as Ampuero's words were not considered satisfactory at the Palace, they forced that same afternoon, Piñera would repeat almost exactly the same speech that his Foreign Minister had expressed hours before.
Within the bureaucracy, they pointed out that the only clarity within this disorder is that Foreign Minister Ampuero failed to emerge from the lethargy and lack of authority that characterized his administration, which is criticized for its role before Bolivia's action against Chile in The Hague. In addition, many stressed that the minister is a "mailbox" of the Presidency and failed to fulfill the role of "orejero" in international affairs for which historically is assigned who acts as chancellor, on the contrary, they recognize that it has been constantly overshadowed by the young advisor on the second floor of La Moneda, Benjamín Salas Kantor, who is much more important than Ampuero and who is a close collaborator of Cristián Larroulet, the second floor chief of the Palace.
That foreign policy management was resolved in the offices of Larroulet was discussed for months in the government and among experts in international affairs, but the last movement with the migration pact was public proof of this. "He left the chancellor without a pulse," they said in the current administration.
In the officialdom explained that the erratic action of Ampuero responds to the profile that Piñera himself wanted to install for the handling of the external relations of his mandate, a person who, although he does not have the necessary experience for the position, has the condition of "I converted "by its leftist past, which makes it the most appropriate to implant the anti-communist discourse and permanently mark the public points in Venezuela and Cuba, two situations that continue to divide the current opposition.
In La Moneda, they tried to protect the chancellor. In addition to emphasizing that most of the international organizations are "captured" by the center-left, they affirmed that, in the eyes of the public, Ampuero is still strong, which has not suffered losses, a view that is supported – they added – by the support that La Moneda on the subject of migrants. And in order to cover up their lack of power, in the construction of the Foreign Relations portfolio, they repeat over and over again that, outside Chile, they all take the phone to the minister.
Concern in the Chancellery
Within the governing party recognizes that the change in international politics is "extreme, although necessary in context." And several people were impressed with the moment when La Moneda decided to make public the resolution not to sign the pact, just two days after the indictment of Chadwick, who lived his worst political moment with the crime of Catrillança.
The reason behind the decision would be the need to reverse the fall of the inquiries that the Government suffered in the case of Catrillança and the time chosen was to divert the attention of public opinion to a question of impact in opinion polls and opinions. public: migrants linked to internal security.
The internal resolution in La Moneda is that, from now on and before the signing of any pact or treaty, it will be analyzed first how this touches the internal of the country. More than privileging foreign policy or multilateralism criteria, domestic politics will always have priority, and to support this criterion, the executive stressed that interest is more in G20-type instances, this exclusive group of the 20 most powerful economies on the planet and in that last appointment Chile was invited by the host country, Argentina, governed by Mauricio Macri, with whom Piñera has a close and fluid relation.
Although Ampuero has won "with sympathy the confidence of the Ministry," the weakness of its networks means that it can not cover the internal uncertainty in the Foreign Ministry because of the real role that this portfolio will have in the next three years that remain. Piñera in the government.
Although it is known that the last word in international affairs obviously corresponds to the President of the Republic, they acknowledged that the foreign officials involved in the issue in question had literally never heard a La Moneda decision in the press. At the heart of the Foreign Ministry, they assured that the minister Ampuero "never received a seat nor permission to comment," a weakness that concerns what could reduce the standard of Chile in the international concert.