BURNABY, B.C. (NEWS 1130) – The National Energy Council (NPS) has descended from the side of Trans Mountain in a dispute with the City of Burnaby about whether the company can continue construction work at the two terminals of the city.
The city of Burnaby argued that Trans Mountain should not be able to continue construction after the court overturned approval of the Trans Mountain project, but NEB said the two orders of approval are not associated with the expansion. The NEB argues that Trans Mountain must be allowed to continue work on the site as it prepares to offer new services to transporters, which includes cleaning trees on the property.
RELATED: NEB wants marine protection program of Trans Mountain plumbing builder
Burnaby, however, argued that the two previously approved applications should be canceled as they are based on the approval of the pipeline expansion project, which is now discarded, and construction should not proceed until plans for the tank park expanded. The town of Burnaby has long been a critic of the pipeline project, which includes building an expanded facility at the Burnaby Mountain Tank Farm at the Westridge Maritime Terminal.
The aforementioned permits allow Trans Mountain to make pipe modifications at the Burnaby Terminal, which NEB says is necessary to "optimize the site in preparation for offering new services to shippers." Deforestation of trees was also permitted.
RELATED: Wait until the Trans Mountain pipe is built before you buy, say Indian investors
The NEB allowed the construction to go forward, saying the new pipeline would "improve the integrity of the Burnaby terminal."
But Burnaby argued that Trans Mountain should not go ahead by expanding the facility into future hypothetical gas pipeline approvals as the pipeline expansion project is still being reconsidered.
Trans Mountain argues that the work needed for the pipeline expansion project now canceled
On January 25, 2017, Trans Mountain requested the relocation of pipelines at the Burnaby Mountain Terminal. In the application, the company said it needed to transfer pipelines and other infrastructure "to allow the construction of tanks and associated infrastructure as part of the Trans Mountain Expansion Project."
TM originally argued that delivery lines on the Burnaby mountain property needed to be reallocated because they would "otherwise interfere with the construction" of the project. #TransMountain pipeline expansion.
– Lauren Boothby (@laurby) January 18, 2019
The company argued that delivery lines had to be reallocated because they would "interfere with the construction of the TMEP". It also says that the pipeline of the facility "would be in some way in the construction of TMEP tanks and associated infrastructure, and would require removal or relocation. "
This request allows the company to build a 832-meter Suncor delivery line and two tank lines, each 295 and 93 meters long.