Internal court: secret votes and a coup for the government by retirees – 12/12/2018


Although the result was presumed late Monday night, not even when they came face to face at the settlement meeting on Tuesday the five Supreme Court justices bleached each other's details of their votes to reject the claim against the law of slogans in Santa Cruz. With this level of mistrust, the five members of the Supreme Court are moving today. Just after noon, each in his office and separately, they were stamping the signatures. Most of the news took up central places on the web portals for hours. Clarín confirmed this early.

At least some background fuel the suspicions between Carlos Rosenkrantz, Elena Highton de Nolasco, Ricardo Lorenzetti, Horacio Rosatti and Juan Carlos Maqueda. The most serious: at one of the previous meetings to discuss the failure of retirees to be known next week information would have leaked to the and motivated an official resolution of the Executive to remove arguments for a possible decision against. These preparatory meetings, as usual, are made between lawyers who answer to each member of the Court. Did you sing any?

Another member of the Supreme Court says that after another meeting, in this case Santa Cruz, his phone started ringing. It had only been an hour and he was called by an employee of Mauricio Macri trying to "convince" him to change his position. More questions: how did Rosada find out?

The distrust does not end there and reaches almost the school subjects: a court judge believes that another was copying part of the arguments which exercised in the decision that endorsed the restriction of the benefit of 2×1 to those convicted of crimes against humanity.

Part of this climate is what affected that in mid-November, it was decided to work out an agenda with the most sensitive failures that would be removed by the end of the year. To avoid any postponement, they agreed to release it to the media. It is not a minor detail: until then, the government had already left aside its concern about the possible economic impact of an adverse decision on the issue of retirement. Y some members of the Court would have suggested kicking the case in 2019. Now they were involved in public.

Exactly the case that will define the formula to calculate wages and indemnities of retirees who have made the State judgment is what will close the hot agenda this year.

In relation to this issue, a specific claim was chosen (that of Lucio Orlando Blanco), but in the Court, another 7,000 similar cases are awaited and the total scope of the decision can be extended to 150,000 cases throughout the country. According to the experts' calculations, if the flaw is favorable to Blanco (and the ISBIC index is taken into account and not the RIPTE) it would correspond to have an increase of 31% who offers the ANSeS with the Historical Repair. Y 50% greater retroactivity by the accumulation of these differences over 15 years.

"Whatever is settled in the Blanco case, the Court then applies it to the other 7,000 that it owns." These files must be signed one by one in the weekly agreements that the judges have. of the 150,000 cases, if the decision of the Court is in favor of Blanco, it is deducted that ANSES will stop appealing and then the situation would normalize and retirees would charge more. Trial judges and cameras are already failing at the highest rate, "he explained. Clarin an expert

As he was able to reconstruct this diary, there would already be at least three votes willing to fail in favor of retirees. On the one hand, Lorenzetti and Maqueda are trained in social security issues, where they determined that the ISBIC index is the corresponding one. For them would be added at least, Horacio Rosatti, sole constitutionalist of the body. Rosenkrantz has already made the decision, but prefers to reserve it. As in previous cases, Highton raises doubts.

In the government itself, a senior source admitted that "for the case chosen, It would be strange if they failed against the plaintiff"With the probable defeat, the Executive would be satisfied with some limitation in the Court's decision, so that those who have accepted Historical Reparation can not join in the claim.

The pink sent to different employees and leaders to try to distort the decision. One of them was the head of ANSeS, Emilio Basavilbaso. He did not take the answers he hoped for. At least a couple of dispatches.

In addition to the legal basis of the case, the Court also a political-social spice. For years, every week, a retired march goes to the Palace of Talcahuano Street for different claims. One of the methodologies of protest is to "list" the members of the Supreme Court. As they call them, they put some insult behind him. The shouts, through the microphone, reach the offices of the magistrates.


Source link