How the portrait of protest in South Africa denigrates the poor


The consensus between the media and the prosecutor presents a protest in South Africa as something abnormal, which must be organized by sinister forces to make it happen.

The protests are still presented as unusual events – the media insists there has been a "wave of protest" triggered by the election campaign. But protest is common in cities and shanty towns, where most poor people live.

From time to time – as now – the media announces that the protest has increased. In fact, South Africa has experienced high levels of protest since 1973, when workers in the port city of Durban reached higher salaries, with only a brief pause between 1994 and 1997. This was undoubtedly motivated by the hope that democracy had occurred. put an end to the need to protest. So what the media really mean when they announce a "wave" of protest is not that there are more protests, but that they have noticed them more.

While attention was drawn to protests in DA-controlled areas, Klerksdorp and Potchefstroom in the North West province and Steynsrus in the Free State were also seized by protests. None of the comments mentions these events, which happened in ANC municipalities and therefore could not have been caused by a desire to embarrass the opposition.


The horror of the protest being organized goes back to the apartheid period. The authorities then claimed that blacks were happy with their lot. When the protest erupted, it had to be because it was organized by agitators who manipulated people to believe that there was something wrong with legalized racism.

All the protest is organized. So are sales of cakes and shopping expeditions – any activity in which humans cooperate needs organization. But that does not mean, as those who mention the organization say, that people are forced to protest by the organizers.


Source link