Saturday , December 7 2019
Home / africa / Hlaudi returns the money to Solidarity, but he still owes more

Hlaudi returns the money to Solidarity, but he still owes more



SABC's former chief operating officer, Hlaudi Motsoeneng, paid R300,000 to the Solidarity union, according to the Labor Court ruling.

In a statement, Solidarity CEO Dirk Hermann said Motsoeneng made the payment after the union embarked on a lawsuit to have its assets confiscated.

However, he said that the $ 300,000 was just part of the total value that Motsoeneng owes.

"The final amount due will be determined as the associated costs [a] Decision of the Constitutional Court, which Motsoeneng also lost, were paid and included in the final amount due, "explained Hermann.

The decision of the Labor Court dates back to 2017, when Motsoeneng was personally liable for the legal costs incurred in an action in which it was found that the so-called SABC 8 had been illegally rejected.

SABC 8 is a group of journalists who have been fired for demonstrating against the broadcaster's decision to censor coverage of the protests.

READ: Hlaudi Motsoeneng takes SCA punitive order of costs to ConCourt

"Although we have deposited Hlaudi's money in a fund to contain more tax abuses, we have not been able to use the money received from Motsoeneng in tax litigation. let's name the fund after him. "

Reacting directly to the union, Motsoeneng, now the chairman of the newly formed political party, the African Content Movement (ACM), said the Solidarity statement was a desperate union PR exercise on a well-known legal issue.

"I have a duty to defend and protect the rule of law," Motsoeneng said in a statement. "It is clear that Solidarity is only seeking political mileage.

"I have a bigger role to play in transforming the country by improving the lives of ordinary South Africans.This is more important than anything else.Anyway, I have already paid some of the money.

"I have nothing more to say."

In the statement, Motsoeneng added: "The question of who gets the name after the fund does not appear. It is extremely irrelevant."


Source link